Author Archives: Jericho Project


Trump budget cuts amount to ‘a homelessness plan,’ advocates say

Originally published in ThinkProgress.

Bryce Covert
March 16, 2018

Carla Parsi has lived in New York City’s East River Houses public housing project for five years. From the moment she moved in, she didn’t want to stay.

“When I moved in and saw what this place was like… I stopped unpacking and I kept telling myself that this is only temporary,” she said. “And I still haven’t unpacked.”

The condition of her apartment has only gotten worse since her arrival. Shortly after she moved in, someone came in to change her shower head but left behind a mess without spackling or painting where the repair had been done. So she decided to fix it herself. “I just got tired of looking at the dirty, ugly looking thing,” she said.

There are other ongoing issues: Parsi says her heat is so high that even with the windows open she’s too hot. “The last time they measured the temperature in my apartment it was 90 degrees,” she said. There’s constantly black mold in her apartment and under her sink. “People cannot get their basic needs met in terms of repairs.”

“I’m struggling with depression and bipolar,” she added. “This situation does not help my condition.”

Then about a year ago her toilet backed up. She called the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) to come repair it, but they didn’t come for four and a half days. Instead, she was told to relieve herself in her bathtub until someone could come out for repairs.

“It’s a mess here,” she said. “You call sometimes for repairs and you don’t get repairs for months on end or years on end.”

President Trump has promised repeatedly that he will “rebuild” the country’s inner cities and address their “unacceptable” conditions. New York’s public housing could especially use this kind of help: NYCHA already has a $17 billion backlog of necessary repairs to its buildings.

But housing problems like the ones Parsi struggles with, and many others facing low-income people trying to find a way to survive in New York City’s sky-high rental market, could soon get a whole lot worse thanks to Trump himself.

On Thursday, Trump released an initial version of his budget. Trump’s “skinny budget” calls for a $6.2 billion cut to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by 2018—a decrease of 13 percent—and the total elimination of some of the agency’s programs.

Describing the budget to reporters on Wednesday, Trump’s budget director, Mick Mulvaney, said the cuts to HUD “go after waste” and “duplicative programs, programs that simply don’t work,” eliminating the ones that “can’t justify their existence.”

“We spend a lot of money on housing and urban development without a lot to show for it,” he said.

But despite Mulvaney calling this an “America-first budget,” much of the country, including New York City, would be devastated by these cuts.

“HUD funds an enormous amount of services for vulnerable New Yorkers,” said Katie Goldstein, executive director of housing advocacy organization Tenants & Neighbors. Such a deep cut “really is a homelessness plan for low-income New Yorkers.”

Others agreed. “This is so devastating, I can’t even conceive of it, truthfully,” said Judith Goldiner, an attorney with the Legal Aid Society.

A direct casualty of Trump’s HUD cut, if enacted into law, would be the federal money New York City gets to operate and repair its public housing. And it already doesn’t get the funding it needs to keep things habitable.

“There is a systemic mold problem in public housing due to infrastructure repair issues,” said Afua Atta-Mensah, executive director of the community organization Community Voices Heard. Many of the roofs leak rain and snow into the buildings, causing the mold buildup, but both issues frequently go neglected. There are other safety issues: hallways don’t have lights; sometimes elevators don’t arrive when called, and tenants are at risk of falling into the shaft.

“HUD was created to make sure public housing is safe,” Atta-Mensah pointed out. But it’s failed to adequately invest in upkeep for years now. “It’s going to be devastating that the Trump administration is tripling down on that policy.”

And residents end up trapped in dangerous housing. “It’s not like when the building gets bad they move to the Poconos,” Atta-Mensah said. “They’re still there… paying rent for horrible conditions.”

If budget cuts mean even fewer repairs happen, Parsi fears it will mean “total collapse” of living conditions in her building.

“It’ll just be like living in a third world country,” she said.

Worse, if conditions get bad enough in public housing the units can be taken completely offline. “That’s something that further feeds into the homelessness crisis,” Atta-Mensah said.

“The public in public housing [are] crossing guards, school workers, health care workers, maintenance workers… A lot of elderly people, a lot of disabled people. And I don’t know where they’re going to go.”

Public housing is an important part of addressing homelessness, especially in a city where more than 73,500 people are already homeless. “Public housing is a really precious resource,” said Tori Lyon, CEO of the Jericho Project, an advocacy organization for homeless veterans. It gives people without shelter an affordable place to live in a city where those are hard to come by.

“The public in public housing [are] crossing guards, school workers, health care workers, maintenance workers,” Goldiner added. “A lot of elderly people, a lot of disabled people. And I don’t know where they’re going to go.”

One place they might have normally turned would be Section 8 vouchers that help low-income Americans afford rent. But those are also put at risk with cuts to HUD as large as what Trump is calling for.

While the city is currently trying to grapple with a budget cut announced last week by reducing the number of active vouchers through attrition, advocates said that strategy can’t cover this kind of deep cut. “We’re talking about people currently getting Section 8 losing it,” Goldiner said.

“With cuts this draconian, I can’t imagine them not having to terminate vouchers,” Atta-Mensah agreed. “There’s nowhere to make up that kind of money.”

The first people who will likely experience this particular pain will be those who have recently been moved off of waiting lists, a process that often takes years. Instead of finally being able to find an apartment they can afford with a voucher, they’ll be given the news that it’s being taken away and they have to keep waiting.

That will only exacerbate the city’s homeless crisis. “Having vouchers be eliminated is a pretty easy way to cause an increase in homelessness,” Goldstein said.

It could directly impact one vulnerable group: formerly homeless veterans. In early 2015, the city announced it would end veteran homelessness by the end of the year, although it didn’t make that deadline. But as part of that effort, there are now about 3,000 formerly homeless veterans using rental vouchers. Those vouchers would be vulnerable to getting rescinded under such huge funding cuts.

Another way the city might translate Trump’s budget cuts into reality would be to cut back on how much of a person’s rent a voucher will cover. What that means for the tenant himself is a sudden increase in rent, almost by definition beyond what he can afford.

“If your rent goes up so high… you can’t afford your rent,” Atta-Mensah said. “The math just is what it is.”

In turn, low-income residents have to turn to “stopgap measures,” she said, once that happens. The elderly often are forced to either move in with their families or into hospital care. Younger families may double or even triple up in one unit. “At the end of the day, it leads to some form of homelessness.”

Other, more targeted cuts will have ripple effects. If the Section 202 and 811 programs that provide affordable housing for the elderly and disabled are scaled back, building owners who participate now are less likely to renew contracts and stay in them. If an owner exits the program, however, his low-income elderly or disabled residents will have to find some other way to afford their rent.

Trump’s budget completely gets rid of HUD’s Community Development Block Grant Program. In New York City, that will drastically erode the budget for the city’s code enforcement agency, spelling in a huge increase in conflict for low-income tenants. “It’s very common for landlords to let a building go into disrepair as a strategy for harassing tenants,” Goldstein said. Landlords in particular who have rent stabilized units have an incentive to kick those tenants out, because if they do, they can hike the rent by as much as 20 percent. “If there’s really no code enforcement department, it would just explode,” she said.

That means low-income people who no longer have an affordable place to live, plus a rent increase on their former apartment for anyone else who might be interested, helping to nudge rent higher overall.

“There’s no question that there’s a clear line between there being weak rent laws, less federal funding, and less affordable housing for real low-income people that leads to homelessness,” Goldstein said. “It’s a really bleak situation.”


Surprise funding cuts from the Trump administration will hit poor New York City residents hard

This article was originally published in ThinkProgress.

Bryce Covert
Mar 13, 2017

Trump’s surprise cuts will only make things worse in a city that already has a housing crisis.

In a surprise move, New York City’s public housing authority received a letter from the Trump administration last week informing it that its federal funding will be cut by millions this year, the largest decrease in five years.

It’s the first wave of potential funding cuts to hit New York City, which has declared itself a sanctuary city. President Trump has already signed an executive order saying that he will strip such cities, which have said they will refuse to have their police enforce deportation and immigration orders, of federal funding.

And the cuts are about to take a huge toll on low-income city residents.

The letter from the federal government said that aid to the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) would be cut by 5 percent. Three streams will be reduced: money to operate public housing, money to operate the Section 8 rental voucher program, and money that actually funds those vouchers. The reductions will leave the agency with a $35 million shortfall.

To deal with the cuts, NYCHA Chair Shola Olatoye said on Monday that service will have to be reduced, particularly in maintenance and repairs for public housing, and the agency will have to consider reducing how many families get rental vouchers and how much rent each voucher will cover. She also vowed that “we will fight any and all cuts” by lobbying the White House.

NYCHA already has a backlog of $17 billion in needed repairs to its public housing buildings, many of which are a half-century old, including problems with mold, leaky roofs, and broken boilers. “We already have a huge crisis in New York City,” said Judith Goldiner, an attorney with the Legal Aid Society. With this cut, even less will get done. “It means…fewer people going out to repair apartments, fewer repairs to apartments.”

That of course means poor or even dangerous living conditions for residents, many of whom are transitioning out of homelessness. “That’s going to further lower the quality of life,” said Tori Lyon, CEO of the Jericho Project, an advocacy organization for homeless veterans. “Families who already have been traumatized and are vulnerable [who have] finally gotten housing that’s affordable…now are possibly faced with having poor quality.”

But even worse, it can mean that precious public housing units, of which there are never enough to meet the demand for affordable housing, disappear. “We’ll see them moving apartments that they just can’t keep up offline and eventually take buildings offline if they can’t keep them up,” Goldiner said.

New York’s rental market is the second-most expensive in the country, with median rent for a one-bedroom costing nearly $3,000 a month, and it has an incredibly low vacancy rate, making it difficult to even find an available place to live.

The cuts to Section 8 vouchers will hurt renters in other ways. The city has already lost about 6,000 vouchers through attrition over the last four years, Goldiner said. “That’s 6,000 families that can’t afford their rent or are living in the homeless shelter system,” she said. That process was expected to continue anyway.

But now it will be sped up. In testimony before the city council on Monday, agency officials said they expect to lose another 4,000 vouchers to deal with the cuts through attrition, refusing to reissue them when families no longer need them. That’s another 4,000 families without the rental assistance they would otherwise qualify for.

Another way the agency may deal with the cuts is to reduce how much rent each voucher covers, putting low-income tenants on the hook to come up with the new difference each month. “That’s a pretty painful thing for people,” Goldiner said. Having to suddenly pay hundreds more dollars in rent is just not possible for many people.

And with money cutting into NYCHA’s Section 8 operating budget, low-income residents may go without vouchers thanks purely to a slower bureaucratic machine. “We could have Section 8 vouchers going unused because it takes so long and there are not enough people there to administer it,” Lyon said. “Even more tragically, we could have homeless people and homeless veterans staying on the streets even if they have a voucher because it takes so long” to finish the process.

The city is braced for even more funding cuts on top of these. In a preliminary draft of Trump’s budget obtained by the Washington Post, set to be released publicly later this week, the administration is contemplating more than $6 billion in cuts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which gives agencies like NYCHA much of their funding. “NYCHA must brace for cuts,” Olatoye said on Monday, “because HUD is as uncertain as we are of what’s to come.”